Tempers Flare, Gavels Bang During Special Called Meeting
Find out what's happening at City Hall from the comfort of your home.
- By Crystal Huskey
- Email the author
- January 9, 2013
http://snellville.patch.com/articles/live-blog-special-called-meeting-regarding-mayor-s-powers-226f6d0a/media_attachments/edit?upload_started=1368905628
asset[new_asset_attachment_attributes][to_id]
3084651
asset[new_asset_attachment_attributes][to_type]
Article
article[new_asset_attachment_attributes][user_id]
new_asset_attachment_attributes
A live blog detailing the special called meeting that took place on Jan. 9, 2013, is above.
Key points:
- Mike Sabbagh was not present.
- Mayor Kelly Kautz stated the meeting was unlawful because she and Sabbagh were not served with a personal notice regarding the meeting. (Read more about that here.)
- All agenda items, found here, were approved four to one.
- Despite the fact that the agenda items were approved, all in favor of retaining Tony Powell, he still may not technically be the City Attorney. That's up to a judge to decide.
- The items that required a "first reading" will be voted on on Monday, Jan. 14, during the regularly scheduled council meeting. (Probably worth going to, I would say. There will be time for public comment, and ethics watchdog George Anderson has requested to speak.)
"There are six elected officials with very strongly held opinions on how the charter should be interpreted," said City Manager Butch Sanders after the meeting. "This meeting, as difficult as it was ... it had to take place. It was the only way those issues were going to be moved toward a resolution. I appreciated the way all of the attorneys tried to give their opinions and interpretations and I just hope that in the future, with clarification, that all this energy can be funneled toward doing good for the city."
Thanks. We'll email you the next time we update this story.
Read More in Government
Recap of Jan. 9 Press Conference Called by Mayor Kelly Kautzsmall_zoom
false
false
33.8187
-84.0438
33.8922
-83.9509
In This article
See More on Patch
- Mayor Kautz Says Recent Allegations are 'Blatantly False'
- City Attorneys Unpaid, Mayor Denies Wrongdoing
- Snellville City Council Approves Board Appointments - But Not Unanimously
- Snellville Officials React to Judge's Decision Regarding Mayor's Powers
- Judge Reverses Mayor's Decision to Dismiss City Attorney
Michelle Couch
8:29 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Great job Crystal! Thanks for covering!
Darla Dixon
8:30 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Interesting and thank you for all your work on this Crystal. I'm looking forward to 2015 election.
Crystal Huskey
9:34 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
You're welcome!
Kenneth Stepp
5:25 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013
You were awesome Krystal.
George Anderson
9:09 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013
I am a Journalism graduate from the Henry Grady School of Journalism at the University of Georgia. It is my opinion that your blog of Meeting and your news stories are an asset to the community-at-large.
Thank you for your professionalism.
George Anderson
Crystal Huskey
9:10 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013
That's very kind of you, thank you Mr. Anderson.
Leslie Johnson
9:35 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013
Great job Crystal.
Sharon Hetherington
1:51 pm on Thursday, January 10, 2013
I attended the meeting while my daughter participated in the blog from home. She understood more of the proceedings than I did. Great job, Crystal. Thank you for your efforts!
Michelle Couch
2:30 pm on Thursday, January 10, 2013
Don't be too hard on yourself Sharon; people have been scratching their heads for years at Snellville council meetings ;)
Marilyn Swinney
4:32 pm on Thursday, January 10, 2013
Crystal - your professionalism just shines through! We are fortunate to have you reporting for Snellville.
Kenneth Stepp
5:57 am on Friday, January 11, 2013
Was anything actually settled at this meeting?
Crystal Huskey
10:00 am on Friday, January 11, 2013
Well, the measures all passed and will go through the regular meeting on Monday. And the votes could have an impact on the judge's decision.
BUT a judge will ultimately have to decide how the City Charter reads and what the intent of the law is regarding whether the mayor can remove Tony Powell (and others) from his post. The judge's decision is a very big deal, because this has been a contentious issue for a long time. The charter is vague in its wording, so the judge will either affirm the fact that the mayor does in fact have the sole authority to remove people from their posts or that she does not.