To Circumcise or Not?
Study indicates the practice of circumcision is declining, but the American Academy said it reduces chances of infection and decline could cost $4 billion in health care costs in coming years.
To circumcise or not – that’s always a big question with the birth of a newborn son. It often causes a difference of opinion, even between the parents, and reports are that the practice is in decline. But the American Academy of Pediatrics is now reported to be moving closer to endorsing the procedure, albeit still with leaving the final decision up to the parents.
Fox News reported that the policy statement Monday from the American Academy of Pediatrics claims that circumcision reduces chances of infection with HIV and transmission diseases, urinary tract infections and penis cancer. It is these benefits that have now caused the academy to update its policy to make this recommendation.
Circumcision is a procedure that removes foreskin at the tip of the penis. The procedure is reported to reduce germs. Another study cites the declining rates and projects that this could add more than $4 billion in health costs in future years as a result of increased illness and infections because of this decline.
The same article, however, reports that activists continue to try and get the procedure banned, saying it amounts to genital mutilation and is merely cosmetic.
So what do you think, is circumcision something that should be encouraged? Or do declining rates indicate that the practice is becoming outdated and not really necessary?
Marne M
8:53 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012
You couldn't pay me enough money to induce me to argue about circumcision on the Internet. There's plenty of fodder to be found in the mommy Internet wars in any online search. I prefer to keep my friends. :-)
David Binder
10:49 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012
But yet you felt the need to comment something?
Cowboy
9:19 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012
Is this all we have to talk about on Gwinnett Patch ?... disappointing......
Sharon Swanepoel
9:49 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012
No Cowboy, you have plenty of other issues to weigh in on - particularly as it comes to politics - such as http://loganville.patch.com/articles/are-you-better-off-than-you-were-4-years-ago-0c82b45b. I thought it might be good to vary it a little for those who might have political burn out (I believe I'm one right now) and believe it or not, this is one topic that often gets people really fired up. However, we would love to start a discussion that might be of interest to you and the rest of our readers. What would you suggest? You can comment here or you can email me your suggestion at sharon.swanepoel@patch.com. There will be plenty more red meat next week when the DNC gets under way.
Larry Reid
10:06 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012
Hey Sharon, I hope there was no pun intended in that last line. : )
Sharon Swanepoel
10:11 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012
Nope, Larry, no pun intended. :)
Brian Crawford
11:06 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012
Reminds me of a funny story.... http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+34&version=NIV
David
11:46 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012
2 When Shechem son of Hamor the Hivite, the ruler of that area, saw her, he took her and raped her.
Where is the humor in this story, Brian? You sick bastard.
Brian Crawford
12:01 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012
David, the humor is in the cleverness of Jacob's sons and the way they retaliated against the Schechemites by conning the Schechemite men into agreeing to become circumcised and then slaying them all while they were writhing in pain. You have to admit, that was a very clever plan.
Sharon Swanepoel
12:03 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012
I have to admit, this is not the direction I expected this conversation to trend. :)
Athens Mama
12:09 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012
Brian, are you making a statement on the nature of Bible stories - thus, saying that many people circumcise because "it's Biblical?" That's what I was told by my ex when I chose not to circumcise my son, now 9. Why on Earth would anyone quote Fox News?
Brian Crawford
4:42 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012
AM....sorry, I wasn't picking sides in the great circumcision debate, although I must admit I'm proud to wear no shroud, I just think Dinah and The Schechemites is a highly under rated Bible story.
Stan Barnes
5:19 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012
Male circumcision is not a Christian religious practice. Chapter 15 in the Book of Acts in the New Testament is very clear on that point of Christian doctrine.
Sharon Swanepoel
12:45 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012
We're equal opportunity quoters here Athens Mama. I get picked on by one side when I quote from Huffington Post and by the other when I quote from Fox News. It makes me feel like I'm doing my job. :)
Athens Mama
6:09 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012
True.
Brian Crawford
4:54 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012
Come to think of it, why is this topic always relegated to mommy blogs? Women don't understand our plumbing any better than we do theirs. If you want to know if circumcision is a good idea, ask any man over 50. There are some very good reasons that I'm glad I've been clipped.
Stan Barnes
5:17 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012
What are the very good reasons for cutting off part of a boy's penis?
Non-religious male circumcision started in the USA in the Victorian Era because medical doctors thought it would keep boys from masturbating.
Stan Barnes
5:11 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012
Medical ethics requires doctors to use effective, non-invasive methods of prevention and treatment first, before they use surgery. Because there are effective, non-invasive ways to prevent and treat problems related to a male's foreskin, it is unethical and inappropriate for a doctor to circumcise a healthy boy.
The idea that male circumcision has medical benefits is based on the false cultural belief that a normal, intact foreskin has no value or function. People in cultures that cut the genitals of children devalue the parts they cut off.
Brian Crawford
5:17 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012
That's a pretty strong argument. Just curious, how often do you see a Urologist Stan?
Dick Scalper
5:40 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012
They brand men like a herd of cows. American men are such wimps to let their sons be subjected to this absurd surgery. If it were women tied down & cut, the Feminists would be howling all over the world. The male genitals are a cheap commodity. There is no argument too absurd for the circumcisers. They insult the appearance of the intact penis, claim that circumcision heals everything from body warts to HIV, and draw an illogical distinction between female & male genitals. Circumcision is the mark of a slave, not a free man.
Top Ten Tortures Less Painful Than Circumcision
10. Get knocked out by Mohammed Ali.
9. Pull out your fingernails.
8. Eat a pile of steaming bear phooey.
7. Skin yourself alive.
6. Fall into a vat of molten iron.
5. Get run over by a train.
4. Go through a sausage grinder.
3. Saw off your legs.
2. Poke out your eyes.
1. Go To Hell
~Dick-Scalper
Athens Mama
6:12 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012
I think this is a very personal decision. All parents must do their best on this one. In regards to HIV and other STDs, I have to say I think it is just slightly strange to suggest I cut off the tip of my son's penis in case he puts himself at risk for sexual disease later. Maybe he will just have a couple of long-term relationships, or maybe even just one? Maybe they'll both be virgins, maybe they'll get tested before they have sex.
Steve R.
8:36 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012
You ever notice some people write things in a blog just to see it on the internet and never write anything that adds value to the subject matter?
Sharon Swanepoel
8:47 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012
Having had sons and grandsons I agree it is a personal decision and is one I've heard debated by the respective parents in a very serious way. In fact, sometimes it has proved to be quite a point of contention. In my experience, fathers like the whole, "like father like son" issue and if a mother has a different opinion, it often takes some compromising and seriously looking at the issues involved.
Mary McQuinn
10:52 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012
I went to China a few years ago and learned about female genital mutilation--which I was strongly against so when I had a son, I read up on circumcision at circ.com and actually viewed one. After reading the history, and the lack of medical studies that proved it reduced cancer, and then watching one via youtube, etc., my response was "over my dead body." From what I read, all the medical advantages can be obtained by using soap and water. Turns out my brothers were not circumcised either and have had no issues that I am aware of. I'll have to check out the American Society of Pediatrics site. I find it hard to believe that they would endorse this barbaric procedure. Some doctors refuse to do them.
Athens Mama
3:41 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012
I researched the subject before my son was born, and I read the same things.
Mary McQuinn
11:01 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012
Here's an excerpt from lower in the document...seems the studies were in Africa where HIV is rampant...
"Two studies have found that circumcision actually increases the risk of H.I.V. infection among sexually active men and women, the academy noted.
Other studies have linked male circumcision to lower rates of infection with human papillomavirus and herpes simplex Type 2. But male circumcision is not associated with lower rates of gonorrhea or chlamydia, and evidence for protection against syphilis is weak, the review said.
The procedure has long been recognized to lower urinary tract infections early in life and reduce the incidence of penile cancer.
Although newborn male circumcision is generally believed to be relatively safe, deaths are not unheard of, and the review noted that “the true incidence of complications after newborn circumcision is unknown.”
Significant complications are believed to occur in approximately one in 500 procedures. Botched operations can result in damage or even amputation of parts of the penis, and by one estimate about 117 boys die each year.
Anesthesia is often not used, and the task force recommended that pain relief, including penile nerve blocks, be used regularly, a change that may raise the rate of complications."
so there is some lowering of risk due to penile cancer and UTIs...didn't say how much.
Most folks I know did it cuz the dad's was done...but if dad had his nose cut off, would you cut off your son's nose?
Bill Berndt
11:20 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012
Hate to say this guys, but there are a lot out there that do not take care of sanitary actions[washing..ie]. Okay, me hetro, but in locker rooms you can smell, and I have bad sinus, if someone doesn't wash. And it comes from men without circumcision. I say have it done in hospital at birth.
Otis The Town Drunk
11:30 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012
I don't believe Ida told your stiffin story Bill. I'll be skipping Lunch today.
Athens Mama
3:43 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012
I think it all begins at home. I have always taught my son, don't forget to pull your skin back - when taking a bath. Keep it clean or it could get infected. If you teach them that over and over, then they do it independently. He's 9 now and has never had a problem.
Gemco Smith
10:15 am on Monday, September 3, 2012
I wasn't and have NO problems